USA-China Human Rights dialogue
Thursday, July 26th, 2012 1:02:41 by Fayyaz Yaseen
US Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Michael Posner will present a read out of the 17th U.S.-China Human Rights Dialogue on July 25 at 12:00 p.m. in the U.S. Department of State Press Briefing
Room. The United States consistently engages China on human rights issues at the highest level. The Human Rights Dialogue is an important mechanism to reinforce these messages, including our position on specific cases.
Assistant Secretary Posner’s remarks will be open to the press. Attending journalists should enter the State Department via the 23rd Street Entrance no later than 11:30 a.m.
Tags: begin, dialogue, human rights, WashingtonShort URL: https://www.newspakistan.pk/?p=29649
Posted by Fayyaz Yaseen
on Jul 26 2012. Filed under USA, World.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
1991, I, Wanxia Liao, a then MA student, challenged a U of Toronto professor David Waterhouse’s theory “beauty is a European concept” and Asians didn’t have it in history, he lost and retaliated against me with a series of frauds in violation of the university’s grading rules, and further racial prejudice that the poor Chinese still want to claim historical inventions. When I complained to the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) I was retaliated with a conspired criminal prosecution.
I was framed by OHRC and a U California professor Cahill. My alleged crime was death threat to Waterhouser as I said “If they are going to kill me, I’m going to kill them too” when answering human rights commission’s questioning on phone. I never spoke of anyone’s name, but a judge convicted me on a “guessing” that I “meant” Waterhouse. The OHRC created this crime by compelling me to testify and then charging me for my testimony, in violation of Constitutional right against self-incrimination.
I sued US government. The court applied case laws that legalize selective law enforcement by law enforcement agencies on basis of their choice, ruled that I have no right to ask them for equal protection of law. So the White professor Cahill is free of any criminal liability for his crime against me as the US government refuses to investigate him, and then the US government is free from any liability to protect him, even by committing more crimes to me like threats of death and disappearance.
The right to free speech is also selectively enforceable in US. My Internet free speech is censored by the US government, including Department of State, and by all the major private media. When I sued, the court ruled the private media are not “government actors” so not liable for violating my free speech rights, as for the real “government actors” like the Department of State, the court ruled they are “immune” from lawsuits so can’t be held liable for violating my free speech rights either.
No one responsible for violating human rights, then there are NO human rights at all. The court did so citing a set of case laws. Clearly, there are two sets of laws in the US. One is the statutes that talk about equal protection under law, the other is the court made laws, which modify, nullify the statutory law towards racial minorities especially the Chinese. Racial discrimination in US has now merely changed its form from the statutory laws to the execution of laws by the courts.